|
SPARE NO AGAG! Texts: 1 Samuel
15; Esther 2:17-3:15 INTRODUCTION TO 1 SAMUEL 15 A. King Saul partially obeyed God, but not completely. 1. he “has not
carried out My commands” (v.11) 2. “I have
carried out the command of the LORD” (v.13) 3. “Why then did you not obey the voice of the LORD…” (v.19; cf. 1 Sam.12:13-15) 4. “I did obey the voice of the LORD” (v.20) 5. “Has the LORD as much delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices As in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice” (v.22) 6. “I feared the people and listened to their voice” (v.24)
2. The killing was discriminate (v.6). 3. The Amalekites were far from innocent. When Israel left Egypt, the Amalekites slaughtered the most vulnerable Israelites who were at the back of the long march (v.2; Deut.25:17-19). C. Haman was a descendant of the Amalekites. I. COMMANDS, LAWS AND DECREES A. The book of Esther contains many references to commands, laws and decrees. 1. “for so the king had commanded” (v.2). 2. “Why are you transgressing the king’s command?” (v.3) 3. “their laws are different…and they do not observe the king’s laws” (v.8). 4. “it was written just as Haman commanded” (v.12). 5. “A copy of the edict to be issued as law…” (v.14) 6. “The couriers went out impelled by the king’s command while the decree was issue at the citadel of Susa” (v.15). B. Esther was obedient to her cousin Mordecai (2:10,20). C. Mordecai was a patriot (2:21-23; cf. Daniel 6) D. Why didn’t Mordecai bow to Haman? “Why are you transgressing the king’s command?” (v.3) 1. No explicit answer is given other than Mordecai was a Jew (v.4). 2. There is nothing in the law of God that forbids our bowing down before rulers (Genesis 23:7; 33:3; 44:14; 1 Samuel 14:4; 24:8; 1 Kings 1:16). E. Haman was the son of Hammedatha the Agagite (Esther 3:1,10; 8:3,5; 9:24). 1. Haman was a descendant of the Amalekites who were enemies of the Jews (cf. Num.24:7; Deut.25:19; 1 Sam.15:2,3). 2. Saul was commanded to kill King Agag and the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15; cf. Exodus 17:13-16). 3. Mordecai and Esther, like Saul, were from of the tribe of Benjamin (Esther 2:5-7). F. The story of Esther is about how a “Benjamite Queen” does what King Saul failed to do. The story of Esther is about how Saul’s “little sin” almost destroyed the entire Jewish people (1 Samuel 15).
B. The seemingly insignificant decisions you make day by day can affect generations after you. C. The seemingly insignificant ground you give to the world, the flesh or the devil will affect not only you, but can affect generations after you (Ephesians 4:27). D. Sin is always malignant and contagious (cf. Genesis 3). III. THE HIGH COST OF OBEDIENCE A. Sin seems trivial, righteousness and obedience often seems impossible. It is almost always easier to do the wrong thing than the right thing. B. Mordecai’s refusal to bow to Haman not only threatened his own life, but all the Jews. C. There was a high cost for Esther when she learned of Haman’s plot. Her life was at stake for coming to the king when not summoned (Esther 4:11).
F. Partial obedience to God’s commandments “is as iniquity and idolatry” (1 Samuel 15:23). 1. Saul was partially obedient…at least from his point of view. a. When Samuel then came to meet Saul, Saul greeted him by saying, “I have carried out the command of the LORD!” (1 Samuel 15:13) b. Saul had excuses as to why he didn’t utterly destroy everything, but God doesn’t accept excuses. 2. Saul even argued with Samuel and insisted that he did indeed obey! (1 Samuel 15:20) QUESTIONS FOR SABBATH DISCUSSION
& MEDITATION Pray that God would enable
you and give you the desire to be conformed to His Word as read and preached
today. Who were the Amalekites? How were they like Muslim slave raiders in
southern Sudan? Name four characters from
Esther and explain who they were. What tribe was King Saul
from? What tribe were Esther and
Mordecai from? Why wouldn’t Mordecai bow
before Haman? Is there any such thing as a
small sin? Why not? Is there any such thing as a
“small righteousness” or a small commitment to King Jesus? Do you have a grandiose
vision of radical obedience? Why isn’t “partial obedience”
obedience? |