THE STRUCTURE OF REVELATION

 

This essay first appeared in Pro Gloria Christi: A Festschrift in Honor of Edward A. Robson; edited by Jonathan M. Watt; pp.161-193.

 

 

Different Approaches to the Structure of Revelation

Chiasmus

Chiasmus in History

Chiastic Structures & Recapitulation in Scripture

Chiasmus, Memory, Education and Oral Communication

Examples Of How Each Of The Kaleidoscopic Views Parallel One Another

Bridges

Literary Structure & its Importance for Interpretation

Conclusion

References

 

Different Approaches to the Structure of Revelation

 

There are two basic approaches to the study of the Apocalypse’s overall structure.[1]  The first approach argues that Revelation is progressive (also called dove-tailing or telescopic [2]) and that there is a chronological progression in the movement of chaps. 4–22.[3]

 

Evidence for the progressive structure of Revelation is most often rooted in Revelation 1:19, “Therefore write the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after these things.”  Those who believe this verse gives us a structural division of the Apocalypse say that the things which you have seen applies to chapter 1, the things which are applies to chapters 2 and 3 and the things which will take place applies to chapters 4:1-22:5. [4] 

 

Two brief observations argue against the progressive view of Revelation 1:19.  First, Revelation 1:19 is what Ed Robson [5] calls a Two-Kai Configuration:

 

γραψον α ειδες και α εισιν και α μελλει γινεσθαι μετα ταυτα

 

“[T]he Two-Kai Configuration…is used to join sentences, prepositional phrases, nouns, verbs, relative clauses, adjectives, and adverbs.  Items drawn together in a Two-Kai Configuration are equal in significance, and purposefully ordered” (Interpretation, 11).

 

Simply stated, Revelation 1:19 does not focus on three distinct periods of time, but rather the entire time period which the New Testament calls the “last days” (Acts 2:17; Hebrews 1:2); “end of the ages” (1 Cor.10:11); “last times” (1 Peter 1:20); and the “consummation of the ages” (Heb.9:26).  The “end” began almost 2,000 years ago with the accomplishment of redemption (see Revelation 1:12-20; 5:1-14), and continues until Jesus returns to judge the living and the dead. 

 

Our observation about Rev.1:19 is further confirmed by Gregory Beale who writes,

 

“The concluding phrase (the things which will take place after these things) is probably a conscious allusion to Daniel 2:28 29, 45, which in the original context refers to the eschatological scope of the vision of God’s kingdom being established throughout the earth. In Daniel 2:28, 45, the phrase “latter days” is used synonymously with “after these things.” If “after these things” refers to the general eschatological age, then Revelation 1:19 cannot express such a tidy chronological formula. It would refer to the eschatological period that includes inauguration in the past, present and future…” (Eschatology). [6] 

 

The second basic approach to Revelation’s overall structure is that of recapitulation, which finds repetition of “The End” at various stages of the book and not just at the end of the prophecy (see esp. Rev.11:15-19; 16:17-21; 19:11-21).  Recognition of the presence of recapitulation in Revelation goes back as far as Victorinus of Pettau [7] who wrote the earliest extant commentary on Revelation.  He recognized that Revelation has several sections which are parallel. [8] 

 

Tyconius wrote a commentary on Revelation around 380 A.D. following the approach of Victorinus.  Although Tyconius’ commentary has been lost, it was heavily cited by Augustine, and it greatly influenced him and the interpretation of the Apocalypse for centuries.  Recapitulation has other names and relatives, including: reiteration, chiasmus, concentric, parallelism, antimetabole, antistrophe, ring composition and inclusio.  In this paper I will also use the term “kaleidoscopic.”

 

Describing the structure of Revelation as “kaleidoscopic” is not new.  Leland Ryken writes, “The kaleidoscopic structure of Revelation consists of brief units, always shifting and never in focus for very long” (How to Read, 170).  Elsewhere Ryken writes, “The linear movement [of Revelation] is not a smooth narrative flow from one event to the next.  The movement is much closer to some of the effects in modern cinema – a kaleidoscopic sequence of visions, pictures, sounds, images, and events, ever shifting and never in focus for very long.  The lack of a smooth narrative sweep, combined with the repetitive structure of the book, makes it impossible to arrange the book according to a rigid chronology in which each event is regarded as following the preceding event or scene” (Words of Delight, 478).  J. Stuart Russell makes a similar observation about the Apocalypse, “[with] every turn of the instrument producing a new combination of images, exquisitely beautiful and gorgeous, while the elements which compose the picture remain substantially the same” (The Parousia, 378). 

           

Understanding the structure of Revelation is a bit like anatomy.  Knowledge of anatomy does not heal a patient, but without anatomy, a doctor has little chance of detecting what is happening in the human body. [9]  Likewise, without knowledge of the structure of Revelation, the reader will have little chance of interpreting much of the book.  In fact, the conclusion one comes to concerning the overall anatomy of Revelation will have ramifications for the interpretation of the entire book.  For example, the more one agrees with the overarching kaleidoscopic nature of Revelation, the more difficult it will be to maintain either a premillennial [10] or a historicist [11] interpretation of Revelation.

 

Chiasmus

 

The observation that the anatomy of Revelation is kaleidoscopic becomes stronger when one studies chiasmus. [12]  Chiasmus is named after the Greek letter chi (X) because chiasms can be marked with it (X marks the spot).  Take for example Revelation 3:7:

 

 

who opens and no one will shut,

and who shuts and no one opens

 

Note how the two claims of Revelation 3:7 can be laid out parallel to each other with a line drawn to connect the key words forming a X.   Another way of thinking about chiasmus is as a frame around a picture, the purpose of which is to make the picture all the more obvious.  The “frame” of chiasmus is usually arranged in the following manner: A:B:A , A:B:C:B A, A:B:C:C:B:A , etc.  Our earlier example would look like this:

 

A  who opens

B  and no one will shut

B1 and who shuts

A1 and no one opens

 

Chiasmus in History

 

Chiasmus is common throughout literary history. [13]  It is found in modern history in the writings and speeches of men like Winston Churchill, John F. Kennedy, Oscar Wilde, George Bernard Shaw, Shakespeare, and Ben Franklin. [14]  Chiasmus has been found as early as the third millennium B.C. [15]    Quintilian, the first century A.D. Roman rhetorician argued:

                                                

A literary work should begin and end in the same way, with similar material  (and so should smaller passages within the work), with the most important material in the middle.  Typically, each unit begins and ends with narrative material between which discourse material will be framed.   Furthermore, passages should not be simply juxtaposed, strung together, without connecting links.  From the rhetoricians dramatists borrow the principle that passages should be ‘mixed and tied together by their ends’  (Lucian); each part should be prepared for by ‘seeds of proof sown’ in the preceding part (quoted in Stock). [16]

 

Chiastic Structures & Recapitulation in Scripture

 

Chiastic structures can be found throughout Scripture.  Take for example John’s introduction of the principle persecutors of the church and then their judgment:

 

 

A  Introduction of Death & Hades (Revelation 6:8)

B  Introduction of the dragon (12)

C  Introduction of the beast and the false prophet (13)

D  Introduction of Babylon (14:8; 16:19; 17:1-6)

D1 Destruction of Babylon (18)

C1 Destruction of the beast and the false prophet (19:20)

B1 Destruction of the dragon (20:1-10)

A1 Destruction of Death and Hades (20:14)

 

One can observe the reversal of the order in which these principle persecutors are destroyed (Lund, 354).  Another example of John’s use of chiasmus is his mention of time:

 

A  forty-two months (11:2)

B   twelve hundred and sixty days (11:3)

C    three and a half days (11:9)

C1  three and a half days (11:11)

B1  twelve hundred and sixty days (12:6)

A1 forty-two months (13:5) (Lund, 408)

 

Several commentators have suggested that the book of Daniel is one of the keys to understanding Revelation. [17]  In fact, Gregory Beale proposes, “Daniel may be more determinative on the overall theology and structure of the Apocalypse than any other traditional or OT source.”[18]

 

Chiastic/kaleidoscopic structure is found in the Aramaic section of Daniel (chapters 2-7), where chapter two parallels chapter seven, chapter three parallels chapter six and chapter four parallels chapter five. [19]  

 

Chapter 2: A vision of four kingdoms and their end (Nebuchadnezzar)

Chapter 3: Faithfulness and a miraculous rescue (Daniel’s three friends)

Chapter 4: Judgment warned and experienced (Nebuchadnezzar)

Chapter 5: Judgment warned and experienced (Belshazzar)

Chapter 6: Faithfulness and a miraculous rescue (Daniel)

Chapter 7: A vision of four kingdoms and their end (Daniel) [20]

 

 

Recapitulation/parallelism is found in Daniel 2, 7-8 and 11-12: [21]

 

 

DANIEL 2

 

DANIEL 7-8

 

DANIEL 11-12

 

Head of Gold = Babylon (2:37)

 

 

Lion with wings of eagle = Babylon (7:4)

 

3rd year of Cyrus.  Babylon had already fallen (10:1)

 

Chest & arms of silver = Medo-Persia (2:39)

 

 

 

Bear = Medo-Persia (7:5; cf.8:20)

 

“three more kings are going to arise in Persia” (11:2; cf.10:1)

 

Belly & Thighs of Bronze = Greece (2:39)

 

 

 

Leopard with four wings = Greece (7:6; cf.8:21)

 

A mighty King = Greece & Alexander the Great

(11:2-4)

 

Legs of Iron = Rome (2:40-43).  During this period of time (“latter days” [2:28]) the everlasting Kingdom of God would be established (2:34,35,44,45)

 

Fourth beast, dreadful, terrifying and extremely strong = Rome (7:7,8).  During this period of time the One like a Son of Man would be presented to the Ancient of Days… (7:13,14; see Rev.4-5)

 

The King = Time of Roman Empire/Herodian Dynasty (11:36-12:4).  This period of time is referred to as the “latter days” (10:14) and “the time of the end” (11:27,35,40;12:4,9). [22] It is closely related to the “latter days” of Dan.2:28 and the events of Daniel 9:24-27

 

Chiasmus, Memory, Education and Oral Communication

 

Chiasmus is a mnemonic device, a highlighter for the ear, or an “oral typesetting” [23] (remember that ancient scribes didn’t have fancy word processors with bold, italics, highlighting, different fonts, etc.).  Today, we write primarily for people’s eyes.  In biblical times, people wrote to be heard, “Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy” (Rev.1:3); “He who has an ear, let him hear…” (Rev.2:7,11,17,29; 3:6,13,22; 13:9); “I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book…” (Rev.22:18).

 

When we see or hear the term “read” we typically think of silent reading.  But in ancient times, private reading was nearly always done aloud.  When Philip went to the chariot of the Ethiopian eunuch, Luke says that Philip “heard him reading Isaiah the prophet” (Acts 8:30).

 

Ambrose of Milan, the great 4th century bishop and champion of orthodoxy, was an anomaly. [24]  Augustine wrote about Ambrose’s silent reading in the Confessions, “When he read his eyes scanned the page and his heart sought out the meaning, but his voice was silent and his tongue was still. Anyone could approach him freely and guests were not commonly announced, so that often, when we came to visit him, we found him reading like this in silence, for he never read aloud” (quoted in Manguel, 40). [25] Ancient libraries would have been noisy places!

 

We might therefore translate Revelation 1:3, “Blessed is he who reads aloud and those who hear the words of the prophecy.”  This insight into the orality of Revelation is significant for its interpretation. [26]  John not only chose words to convey meaning, but meaning is conveyed by word structure (e.g. chiasmus and parallelism) and also in their sounds.

 

In Roman times chiasmus was built into the very method in which children were taught.  Children did not simply learn the alphabet from A à Z like they do today.  They learned the alphabet backwards from Z à A and then both ways at once, the English equivalent of A-Z, B-Y, C-X, D-W etc. [27] 

 

This may be significant when one looks at the Greek alphabet.  The Greek letters mu-nu are the center of the Greek alphabet, so it is probably not coincidental that the name of the Greek goddess of memory was Mnemosyne.  The middle two letters of the Greek alphabet were also the first two letters of the Greek words for “mindful/keep thinking” (μνημονεύω), “remember” (μνεία), “memory” (μνήμη), “memorial/tomb” (μνῆμα/μνημει̂ον), etc. [28]  From these Greek words we get our English word “mnemonic” and “amnesia.” 

 

Not only was chiasmus appropriate as a mnemonic aid for oral communication, but it also lent itself to the written medium of scrolls.  When rolled up, one would be in the center of a work.  As a scroll was unrolled, the symmetry of a work could be revealed.  Today some people read the end of a book to see what happens.  In ancient times, one might read the center of a scroll to learn the main point.  With this background in mind we are now ready to begin unscrolling the structure of Revelation:

 

 

Structure of Revelation

 

 

 

 

 

Revelation is comprised of seven sections and each begins in heaven and ends on the earth with a description of judgment and/or reward.  The seventh and final kaleidoscopic view ends with the heavens and the earth coming together.

 

Some of the judgments at the end of each turn of the kaleidoscope have occurred already, such as the judgments promised upon some of the seven churches if its members did not repent.  I believe that the 2nd Kaleidoscopic View parallels the 6th, and that both end with covenantal judgment poured out upon Apostate Israel in 70 AD. [29]  The 1st Kaleidoscopic View parallels the 7th in that both bring the reader to the consummation and the Final Judgment of those who are outside of Christ and the reward of overcomers.  Regardless of how one interprets the seven sections, each kaleidoscopic view traces the fulfillment of the Lord’s Prayer with God’s will done on earth as it is in heaven. [30]  Every section emphasizes that all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to the risen and exalted Christ. 

 

Indicators of a New Kaleidoscopic View

 

As mentioned above, the earliest commentators of Revelation have sensed something of the kaleidoscopic structure of Revelation.  Yet one of the greatest difficulties has been discerning when and where a new section begins.  This is one of the weightiest arguments against recapitulation.  David Aune writes, “if the phenomenon of recapitulation is present, it lacks any clear formal literary indications of its presence or (perhaps more likely) belongs to an earlier level of composition than that now extant in Revelation” (Revelation 1-5, xcii).  In answer to this criticism I offer three indicators of recapitulation:

 

1. Groups of seven, or heptads, are found in each section of Revelation (see 2nd diagram).  Each kaleidoscopic turn ends with the promise or description of Christ’s mediatorial judgment or reward. 

 

2. One of Craig Blomberg’s criteria for detecting an extended chiasmus is that “verbal (or grammatical) parallelism as well as conceptual (or structural) parallelism should characterize most, if not all, of the corresponding pairs of subdivisions.”  From the diagrams below one can note these and other forms of parallelism.  

 

3. Perhaps the most important literary indicator of the presence of recapitulation is the use of bridges (sometimes referred to as hooks, interlocking, literary hinges, or a Janus [31]).   Bridges link the various sections of Revelation together. [32]  They are formal literary indications that one section of Revelation is segueing into the next.  They are like the body’s ligaments and joints which hold our skeletal structure together.

 

 

 

 

EXAMPLES OF HOW EACH OF THE KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEWS PARALLEL ONE ANOTHER

 

PROLOGUE AND EPILOGUE

 

PROLOGUE (Revelation 1:1-8)

EPILOGUE (Rev.22:10-22:21)

 

 

Rev.1:1: “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must shortly take place; and He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John,

Rev.22:6:  And he said to me, “These words are faithful and true”; and the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel [cf. also 22:16] to show to His bond-servants the things which must shortly take place.

 

 

 

Rev.1:1: The prophetic chain: God, Jesus Christ, Spirit, His Angel, John, Pastors, People.

 

Rev.22:6-8,17: The prophetic chain: God, the Lord, Spirit; His Angel, John, Prophets, Servants.

 

 

 

Rev.1:3: Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.

 

Rev.22:7: “And behold, I am coming quickly. Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book.”

 

 

 

Rev.1:3: Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.

 

Rev.22:10: And he said to me, “Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, for the time is near.

 

 

 

Revelation 1:4: John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace, from Him who is and who was and who is to come; and from the seven Spirits who are before His throne;

 

Revelation 22:16: “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star.”

 

 

 

Revelation 1:7: Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. Even so. Amen.

 

Revelation 22:12: “Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.

 

 

 

Revelation 1:8: “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”

 

Revelation 22:13: “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.”

 

 

 

Revelation 1:7: Behold, He is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. Even so. Amen.

 

Revelation 22:20: He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.

 

 

 

PARALLELS BETWEEN THE 1ST & 7TH KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEWS [33]

 

1st KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.1:9-3:22)

7th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.20:1-22:9)

 

The Seven Churches: Christ & His Church Militant          

The Millennium & Sabbath Rest (Church Triumphant)

 

PROMISES MADE TO OVERCOMERS

CONSUMMATION OF CHRIST’S PROMISES

Ephesus: ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who OVERCOMES, I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the Paradise of God.’ (2:7)

 

in the middle of its street. And on either side of the river was the tree of life, … (22:2).

 

 

 

Smyrna: ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who OVERCOMES shall not be hurt by the second death.’ (2:11) 

 

Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years (20:6; cf. 21:7,8).

 

8 …The first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life….

9 ‘I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), you will have tribulation for ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life (2:8,10)

 

… and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years (20:4)

 

 

 

Pergamum: ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who OVERCOMES, to him I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows but he who receives it.’ (2:17)

 

He who overcomes will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be My son (21:7).

 

 

 

Thyatira: ‘And he who OVERCOMES, and he who keeps My deeds until the end, to him I will give authority over the nations; 27 and he shall rule them with a rod of iron, as the vessels of the potter are broken to pieces, as I also have received authority from My Father; (Rev.2:26,27)

 ‘And he who OVERCOMES…I will give him the morning star (2:26,28)

 

and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

6 Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years (20:4,6; cf. 19:15; 22:6,16).

 

 

 

 

Sardis: ‘He who OVERCOMES shall thus be clothed in white garments; and I will not erase his name from the book of life, and I will confess his name before My Father, and before His angels (3:5).

 

and nothing unclean and no one who practices abomination and lying, shall ever come into it, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life (21:27; cf. 19:7-8,14; 20:12; 21:2).

 

 

 

 

Philadelphia: ‘He who OVERCOMES, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write upon him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name (3:12).

 

And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband…10 And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me the holy city, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God (21:2,10).

 

 

 

‘He who OVERCOMES… I will write upon him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem… (3:12)

… and His name shall be on their foreheads. (22:4)

And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God… (21:2).

 

 

 

Laodicea: ‘He who OVERCOMES, I will grant to him to sit down with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne (3:21).

 

Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them…. and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years (20:4,6).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SECOND EXAMPLE OF PARALLELS BETWEEN THE 1ST & 7TH KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEWS [34]

 

1st KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.1:9-3:22)

7th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.20:1-22:9)

The Seven Churches: Christ & His Church Militant

Millennium & Sabbath Rest: Christ & His Bride are Triumphant

 

THE IMPERFECTIONS OF THE CHURCH IN THE OLD CREATION

THE PERFECTIONS OF THE CHURCH IN THE NEW CREATION

 

 

 

false prophets (Rev.2:2)

 

twelve true apostles (Rev.21:14)

 

 

false Jews (Rev.2:9; 3:9)

 

the names of the tribes of true Israel  (Rev.21:12)

 

 

 

Christians dwell where Satan’s throne is (Rev.2:13)

 

Christians dwell where God’s throne is (Rev.22:1).

 

 

 

some in the church are dead (Rev.3:1)

 

All in the new Jerusalem are written in the Lamb’s book of life(Rev.21:27)

 

 

the church is faltering, temporal lampstand (Rev.1:20; 2:5)

 

God and the Lamb are the eternal lamps (Rev.21:23-24; 22:5)

 

 

The church is filled with idolatrous impurities (2:14-15,20) and liars (Rev.2:9; 3:9).

there will be only purity and truth in the new creation (Rev.21:8,27).

 

 

Christians face persecution, hoping in God’s promises to overcomers (Rev.2:8-10,13).

In the new creation they reign, having inherited these promises (Rev.2:7=22:2; 2:17=22:4; 3:5=21:27; 3:12=21:10 and 22:4; 3:21=22:1 and 22:5).

       

 

 

 

PARALLELS BETWEEN THE 2ND & 6TH KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEWS

 

2nd  KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.4:1-8:1,3-5)

6th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.17:1-19:21)

 

THE THRONE OF RULE, PRAISE AND WORSHIP

THE “THRONE” OF RUIN, WEEPING AND LAMENTING

 

 

Immediately I was in the Spirit; and behold, a throne was standing in heaven, and One sitting on the throne (Revelation 4:2).

And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns (Revelation 17:3).

 

 

Universe Governed By God’s Throne: and behold, a throne was standing in heaven, and One sitting on the throne. (Rev.4:2)

Judgment Of The Harlot’s “Throne”: “Come here, I shall show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters, 3 And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness; and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast, (Rev.17:1,3)

 

 

Description of the One sitting on the throne (4:2ff.).  Note the description of the Person, throne, and character.

Description of the woman sitting on a scarlet beast (17:3-5). Note the description of the person, throne, and character.

 

 

God’s throne is surrounded by heavenly creatures & the redeemed who praise Him (Rev.4:4,5,7,11,13).  The redeemed are very close to their Redeemer (7:15-17)

The woman’s throne is surrounded by those who dwell on the earth (Rev.17:8,), peoples & multitudes and nations and tongues (17:15), those who participated in the woman’s sins (18:4,9-19).  These weep and lament over her (18:9) and stand at a distance because of fear of her torment (18:10)

 

 

Purity of the Lamb (5:9/see the sacrificial laws about blood)

 

Impurity of the woman (17:4/see the Levitical laws about blood and menstruation)

 

 

Salvation (Rev.5:9-10)

Damnation (Rev.18:1ff)

 

 

Singing (Rev.5:9)

Cessation of singing (18:22)

 

 

saying with a loud voice, “Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing.” (Rev.5:12)

“And they threw dust on their heads and were crying out, weeping and mourning, saying, ‘Woe, woe, the great city, in which all who had ships at sea became rich by her wealth, for in one hour she has been laid waste!’ (Rev.18:19)

 

 

And when He broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; (Rev.6:9)

 

And I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. And when I saw her, I wondered greatly. (Rev.17:6)

 

 

 

 

great multitude (ὄχλος πολύς; 7:9) worshipping

 

 

¨      And all the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures; and they fell on their faces before the throne and worshiped God (Rev. 7:11)

 

19:1-10 - great multitude (ὄχλου πολλοῦ  [v.1]; ὄχλου πολλοῦ [v.6]) worshipping

 

¨      And the twenty-four elders and the four living creatures fell down and worshiped God who sits on the throne saying, “Amen. Hallelujah!” (Rev. 19:4)

 

 

 

PARALLELS BETWEEN THE 3rd & 5TH KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEWS

 

3rd KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.8:2,6-11:19)

5th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.15:1,5-16:21)

 

THE SEVEN TRUMPETS: THE KINGSHIP OF CHRIST OVER CREATION

THE SEVEN BOWLS

 

 

1st Angel of Judgment: earth (Rev.8:7) [note the judgment here is upon creation]

 

1st Angel of Judgment: earth (Rev.16:2) [note the judgment here is upon men]

 

 

 

2nd Angel of Judgment: the 1/3 of the sea becoming blood (Rev.8:8)

2nd Angel of Judgment: the sea becoming blood/the damage is more extensive than the 3rd Kaleidoscopic View (16:3)

 

 

3rd Angel of Judgment: 1/3 of rivers and springs of waters (Rev.8:10-11)

3rd Angel of Judgment: rivers & springs of waters/damage more extensive (Rev.16:4)

 

 

4th Angel of Judgment: 1/3 of sun, moon and stars leading to darkness (Rev.8:12) [note the judgment here is upon creation]

4th Angel of Judgment: the sun is affected leading to scorching heat (Rev.16:8,9) [note the judgment here is upon men]

 

These following three trumpets are set off from the others because they are called woes.  These woes lead up to the consummation.

 

 

 

 

5th Angel of Judgment: The first woe and the abyss (Rev.9:1-12)

5th Angel of Judgment: The throne of the beast.

 

 

6th Angel of Judgment: great river Euphrates (Rev.9:13-21)

6th Angel of Judgment: great river Euphrates & Armageddon (Rev.16:12-16)

 

 

7th Angel of Judgment: Announcement concerning Christ’s Kingdom and His reign (Rev.11:15-18) [φωναὶ μεγάλαι ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ λέγοντες, ]

 

 

 

¨      Temple (v.19)

¨      Flashes of lightning (v.19)

¨      sounds and peals of thunder (v.19)

¨      an earthquake (v.19)

¨      great hailstorm (v.19)

 

7th Angel of Judgment: Announcement, “It is done” (Rev.16:17-21) [φωνὴ μεγάλη ἐκ τοῦ ναοῦ ἀπὸ τοῦ θρονοῦ λέγουσα, Γέγονεν]

 

 

 

 

¨      Temple (v.17)

¨      Flashes of lightning (v.18)

¨      sounds and peals of thunder (v.18)

¨      great earthquake (v.18)

¨      huge hailstones (v.21)

 

 

 

 

The third kaleidoscopic view mentions three woes in 8:13. The first woe is connected with the fifth trumpet and occurs in 9:1-12 (see v.12), the second woe is linked with the sixth trumpet and is realized by 11:14.  The third woe is never specifically mentioned as having been accomplished.  However, 8:13 indicates that the last three trumpets are the three woes, “Woe, woe, woe, to those who dwell on the earth, because of the remaining blasts of the trumpet of the three angels who are about to sound!”

An argument for recapitulation is found in 10:7, “But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, then the mystery of God is finished, as He preached to His servants the prophets”.  Based upon this solemn oath, we are to understand that seventh trumpet as taking us to The End (i.e. the consummation) and yet there are still eleven chapters after the seventh trumpet is sounded!  The reason for this is that the last eleven chapters recapitulate what has already been revealed, along with a description of  the new heavens and the new earth.

The progression present from the 3rd to 5th kaleidoscopic view is a progression of judgment that becomes increasingly severe.  Both judgments are a call to repentance (9:21; 16:10). 

 

Bridges

 

The transition between the kaleidoscopic sections of Revelation is made evident by “bridges” which link previous sections with new ones. 

 

 

 

THE KALEIDOSCOPIC/ PARALLEL STRUCTURE OF REVELATION & ITS “BRIDGES"[35]

 

PROLOGUE

Revelation 1:1-8

 

1:9-11 serve as a bridge between the prologue and the first kaleidoscopic view:  “John (vv.1,4 with v.9),” “testimony of Jesus (v.2 with v.9),” “word of God (v.2 with v.9),” “seven churches (v.4 with v.11),” and “kingdom (v.6 with v.9)” link this transition with what John wrote in vv.1-8.  The listing of the seven churches: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia and Laodicea in 1:11 looks forward to the seven letters in chapters 2-3. 

EPILOGUE

Rev.22:10-22:21

 

22:6-9 constitute the final bridge of Revelation.  This final transition is the most complex because it not only introduces the epilogue but it also forms an inclusio with the prologue (e.g. John directly addresses the audience [22:8; 1:9]; blessing is pronounced [22:18; 1:3]; the benediction of grace [22:21] takes one back to the salutation of grace [1:4] {Barr, 249}). 

 

 

1st KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.1:9-3:22

 

The sitting of Christ with His Father on His throne (3:21) marks the transition between the first and second kaleidoscopic view where John sees the throne of the Father (4:1-11) and the Son approaching the throne and receiving divine authority (5:1-14).

7th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.20:1-22:9

 

Chapter 20 introduces a new vision narrative and brings the reader/hearer back to the 1st century A.D. following the casting of Satan from heaven and his being bound.  The bridge marking the transition between the sixth and seventh kaleidoscopic view is 20:3 where “deceive” and “nations” link up with the deception of the nations by the false prophet in 19:15,18-21.  The judgment described in 19:17-21 completely destroyed the godless nations deceived by the beast and false prophet and so the mention of nations and protection from deception in 20:3 alerts the reader that another turn of the kaleidoscope is beginning (see White, Reexamining…, 319-44).

 

 

2nd KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.4:1-8:1,3-5

 

In 8:1-5 there is an interweaving with 8:1,3-5 belonging to the second kaleidoscopic view and 8:2 marking the transition with the third kaleidoscopic view.  The “misplacement” of verse 2 alerts the reader/hearer that a new section is commencing.

6th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.17:1-19:21

 

The use of one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls in 17:1 serves as a bridge between the bowl judgments in 15:1,5-16:21 and the judgment of the harlot in 17:1-18:24.

 

 

3rd KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.8:2,6-11:19

 

The only section without a bridge is the transition between the third kaleidoscopic view to the fourth.  The reason for this is that “With the seventh trumpet-blast the Kingdom of God has come, and the general judgement is at hand…If the Book had ended here, it would have been within these limits complete” (Swete 146).  The very fact that vv.11:15-19 bring the hearer to The End alerts the reader that what follows in 12:1ff. begins another turn of the kaleidoscope.  It may also be of importance that the Greek word “sign” and its cognates are used seven times in Revelation.  The first instance is 1:1 (semaino) and the second instance is 12:1 (semeion) (Hall, 287f.).

 

5th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.15:1,5-16:21

 

 

15:1 is another “misplaced” verse which like 8:2 alerts the reader/hearer of Revelation that another kaleidoscopic section is about to begin.  In 15:1 the seven angels with the seven plagues are introduced, but they are “interrupted” until 15:5. 

 

4th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW

Rev.12:1-15:2-4

 

 

 

 

 


 

Literary Structure & its Importance for Interpretation

 

The preacher/teacher must understand that an appreciation of the literary structure of Revelation will help understand its literal sense. [36]  In fact, it is of great benefit when exegeting the notoriously difficult passage: “and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years” (Revelation 20:4).  George Elton Ladd writes with only slight exaggeration that they came to life (one word in the Greek: ἔζησαν) “is the most important word in the entire passage.  The exegete must decide whether or not it means resurrection; and upon this decision will be determined how he interprets the entire passage” (265).  We believe that the meaning of this important verb is to be found in the parallel kaleidoscopic views and Christ’s promise to the overcomers at Smyrna:

 

 

1st KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.1:9-3:22)

7th KALEIDOSCOPIC VIEW (Rev.20:1-22:5)

 

The Seven Churches: Christ & His Church Militant          

Christ & His Church Triumphant

 

…The first and the last, who was dead, and has come to life (ἔζησαν) …. ‘Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to cast some of you into prison, so that you will be tested, and you will have tribulation for ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. 11 ‘He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes will not be hurt by the second death.’ (Rev.2:8,10,11).

 

…And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life (ἔζησαν) and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. 5 The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed. This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years (Revelation 20:4-6).

 

 

 

Jesus was faithful unto death and came to life (Revelation 2:10).  The beheaded saints who remained true in the worship of the one true God come to life (Revelation 20:4). The promise Jesus gives to the church at Smyrna is that if they are faithful to death, they would be confirmed in life by a crown of life.  The crown in Revelation 2:10 is a symbol of rule and authority, and Revelation 20 depicts the reality with the saints reigning with Christ.

 

The “ten days” of tribulation in Revelation 2:10 is paralleled in Revelation 20:4 by the 1,000 years reigning with Christ (cf. Rev.20:2). [37]  Both sections mention not being hurt by “the second death.” If Christ’s statement in Revelation 2:10, “Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life,” is a reference to the intermediate state, then there is strong evidence that the parallel passage in Revelation 20:4-6 is also a reference to the intermediate state. [38]

 

The emphasis of Revelation 2:10 and 20:4-6 is on the “not yet” aspect of our reign with Christ, which is spoken of elsewhere in the New Testament (2 Timothy 2:10-12a; James 1:12).

 

Conclusion

 

God, who spoke His Word and brought forth the beautiful, complex and intricate structure of creation, is the same God who inspired John to write the beautiful, complex, and intricate scroll.  Indeed, there seems to be a parallel between the revelation of Genesis 1:1-2:3 and its account of creation, the emphasis on “seven,” “sabbath rest,” the parallels between the formation and filling of the earth, and the literary form of the Apocalypse which focuses on the last days and the new creation. [39]

 

This paper argues for a kaleidoscopic structure of Revelation as opposed to a telescopic structure.  The overall structure of Revelation has ramifications for the book’s understanding and even offers successful navigation though the interpretive Scylla and Charybdis of Revelation 20.  It is my prayer that this paper will be used by God to iron out some of the apocalyptic wrinkles from the gown of Christ’s bride.

 

References

 

Aune, David E. Revelation. Dallas: Word Books, 1998. (three vols.)

 

Balentine, Samuel.  The Torah’s Vision of Worship.  Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

 

Barr, David L.“The Apocalypse of John as Oral Enactment,” Interpretation 40 (1986): 243-56.

 

Bauckham, R. J. The Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1993.

 

———. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993.

 

______. Revelation.  In The Oxford Bible Commentary.  London: Oxford University Press, 2001.

 

Beale, G. K. “The Influence of Daniel upon the Structure and Theology of John’s Apocalypse,” JETS 27 (1984): 413-423.

 

______. “Eschatology.” In Dictionary of the Later New Testament & Its Developments (Logos electronic ed.); ed. Martin, Ralph P. et al. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press, 1997.

 

______.  The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.

 

______. “The Structure and Plan of John's Apocalypse” in Creator, Redeemer, Consummator: A Festscrift for Meredith G. Kline (ed. G. Howard and J. Muether), Reformed Academic Press, 2000.

 

Blomberg, C.L. "The Structure of 2 Corinthians 1–7", Criswell Theological Review 4 (1989) 4-8.

 

Breck, John.  The Shape of Biblical Language: Chiasmus in the Scriptures and Beyond. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1999.

 

Brown, Colin.  “Number.”  In The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 2,  Colin Brown, Ed., 702-703.  Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, [1976] 1986.

 

Charles, R. H. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John. 2 Vol(s). Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1920.

 

Dorsey, David A. The Literary Structure of the Old Testament, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1999.

 

Giblin, Charles H., “Recapitulation and the Literary Coherence of John’s Apocalypse.” CBQ 56 (1994) 81-95

 

Goldingay, John E. Daniel. Word Biblical Commentary. Volume 30.  Dallas: Word Books, 1989.

 

Grothe, Mardy.  Never Let a Fool Kiss You or a Kiss Fool You: Chiasmus and a World of Quotations That Say What They Mean and Mean What They Say. New York: Viking, 1999.

 

Hall, Mark Seaborne.  “The Hook Interlocking Structure of Revelation: The Most Important Verses in the Book and How They May Unify Its Structure,” Novum Testamentum 44 (2002) 278-296.

 

Hendriksen, William.  More Than Conquerors: An Interpretation of the Book of Revelation.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, [1940] 1994.

 

Johnson, L. T., & Penner, T. C. The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation. Rev. ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999.

 

Ladd, George Eldon. A Commentary on the Revelation of John. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1972.

 

Lund, Nils Wilhelm. Chiasmus in the New Testament.  Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, [1942] 1992. 

 

Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. New York: Viking, 1996.

 

Mclean, John A.  “The Structure Of The Book Of Revelation And Its Implication For The Pre-Wrath Rapture, Part One,” Michigan Theological Journal, Vol. 2:2, Fall 1991.

 

McCoy, Brad.  Chiasmus: An Important Structural Device Commonly Found in Biblical Literature,CTS Journal Vol.9 No.2 (Fall 2003); available at http://www.chafer.edu/CTSjournal/journals/Vol%209-2%20ar2.pdf; accessed 19 November 2004.

 

Mlakuzhyil, George.  The Christocentric Literary Structure of the Fourth Gospel.  Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1987.

 

Robson, Edward editor, “The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ” in Studies in Revelation.  Pittsburgh, PA: Crown & Covenant, 1979.

 

______.  “Interpretation of the Two-Kai Configurations of the Greek New Testament,” Semper Reformanda, Vol.7:2, Summer 1998.

 

Russell, J. Stuart. The Parousia.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, [1887] 1983.

 

Ryken, Leland. How to Read the Bible as Literature. Grand Rapids, MI: Academie Books (Zondervan), 1984.

 

______.  Words of Delight.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1992.

 

Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth, “Composition and Structure in the Book of Revelation.” CBQ 39 (1977): 344-366.

 

Smith, Christopher R.  “Revelation 1:19: An Eschatologically Escalated Prophetic Convention,” JETS 33:461-466.

 

Strand, Kenneth A.  “Chiastic Structure and Some Motifs in the Book of Revelation,” AUSS 16 (1978) 401-08.

 

______.  “The Eight Basic Visions in the Book of Revelation,” AUSS 25 (1987) 107-21.

 

Stock, Augustine. “Chiastic Awareness and Education in Antiquity,” Biblical Theology Bulletin, 14/1 (1984) 23-27.

 

Swete, H. B. The Apocalypse of John. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan, 1908.

 

Thomas, Robert L.  “The Structure of the Apocalypse: Recapitulation or Progression?” The Masters Seminary Journal 4:1 (Spring 1993): 45-66.

 

______.  Revelation 1—7: An Exegetical Commentary. Chicago, IL: Moody, 1992.

 

______.  Revelation 8—22: An Exegetical Commentary. Chicago, IL: Moody, 1995.  (Note in particular the excursus, “The Structure of the Apocalypse: Recapitulation or Progression?”)

 

Victorinus of Pettau, Commentary on the Apocalypse; available at

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0712.htm

 

Warfield, B.B. “The Millennium and the Apocalypse,” Princeton Theological Review [1904], pp. 599-617; reprinted in Biblical Doctrines (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1981), pp. 643-664.

 

White, R. Fowler.  “Reexamining the Evidence for Recapitulation in Rev 20:1-10,” The Westminster Theological Journal Vol. 51, No. 2 (Fall 1989), pp.319-344.

 

Wilson, Victor M. Divine Symmetries: The Art of Biblical Rhetoric; University Press of America 1997.

 

 

WEBSITES:

 

chiasmus.com

 

A note of appreciation goes to John Delivuk, Associate Professor of Library and Systems Librarian at Geneva College.  He was willing to use his expertise and show me the ropes at the Hekman Library during the 2004 RP International Conference at Calvin College.  Without his assistance I would not have been able to get my hands on some of the above articles.  

 



[1] Martin H. Shepherd (The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse) argues unconvincingly that the structure of Revelation reflects a paschal liturgy.

 

[2] The word “telescopic” is used to convey that the seventh seal contains the seven trumpets and the seventh trumpet opens up to the seven bowl judgments similar to a Matryoshka.  

 

[3] Thomas, Structure of the Apocalypse, 47.

 

[4] See for example R. H. Charles, 1.33.

 

[5] Ed Robson served in Syracuse, NY as pastor for almost twenty-five years and served for twelve years at the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary as Professor of New Testament.  He was instrumental in my study and love for the Scriptures along with the planting of the church I now serve in New Hartford, NY

.  

 

[6] For an extended discussion of Revelation 1:19 see Beale, The Book of Revelation, pp.152ff.

 

[7] Victorinus appears to have been martyred in 303 A.D.

 

[8] In his commentary on chapter 7, Victorinus notes the similarities between the seals, trumpets and bowls: “We must not regard the order of what is said, because frequently the Holy Spirit, when He has traversed even to the end of the last times, returns again to the same times, and fills up what He had [before] failed to see. Nor must we look for order in the Apocalypse; but we must      follow the meaning of those things which are prophesied” (Commentary on the  Apocalypse; http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0712.htm).

 

[9] Thomas Brodie, Genesis as Dialogue; Oxford University Press: New York [2001], 4.

 

[10] Premillennialism argues that Jesus will return before the millennium and that He will reign upon the earth for one thousand years.  A fatal blow to premillennial interpretation would be dealt if our proposed kaleidoscopic view of Revelation is correct with Revelation 20:1 beginning a new section of Revelation as opposed to the traditional premillennial interpretation which sees chapter 20 as a chronological continuation of chapter 19. 

 

[11] William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Knox, Jonathan Edwards, George Whitfield, C.H. Spurgeon, and Matthew Henry; cf. Westminster Confession of Faith 20:2; 23:4; 25:6 and note the Scripture proofs from Revelation) were historicists and interpreted Revelation as a pre-written history that traced the history of western Europe, the rise of Islam, it identified the papacy with the beast of Rev.13, prophesied the Protestant Reformation, etc.

 

[12] Modern study of chiasmus and biblical exegesis dates back to John A. Bengel in the 18th century.  “Though the chiasmus in its simplest form…was well known and cultivated in classical literature, no use seems to have been made of the principle in exegesis until J.A. Bengel called attention to it and employed it, to some extent, in his exposition of the New Testament (Lund, 36).

 

[13] One promising biblical boulevard is the study of phonetic chiasmus in Scripture.  This type of chiasmus is based upon sounds instead of words.  Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s poem Xanadu contains one of the most famous lines in the history of poetry and is an example of phonetic chiasmus: “In Xanadu, did Kubla Khan”:

 

In Xan-a-du

did Ku-bla-Khan

In Zann-uh-doo

did Koo-bluh-Kann

 

Taken from Dr. Mardy Grothe, “What is Chiasmus”. A biblical example is Esau’s statement in Genesis 27:36: 

 

אֶת־בְּכֹרָתִי my birthright

לָקָח he took away

וְהִנֵּה עַתָּה and behold now

לָקַח he has taken away

בִּרְכָתִי my blessing

 

[14] See Grothe, Never Let a Fool Kiss You…

 

[15] Breck, The Shape of Biblical Language, 21.

 

[16] See also G.E. Duckworth, Structural Patterns and Proportions in Vergil’s Aenid (Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan, 1962).

 

[17] Daniel is proportionally the most frequent Old Testament book alluded to in Revelation. 

 

[18] Beale, G. K. “The Influence of Daniel upon the Structure and Theology of John’s Apocalypse,” JETS 27 (1984): 413.

 

[19] If Daniel were arranged chronologically the order of the chapters would be: 1,2,3,4,7,8,5,6,9,10,11,12.

 

[20] Adapted from Goldingay p.158.

 

[21] See G. K. Beale: The Use of Daniel in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature and in the Revelation of St. John. Lanham, MD: University Press of America (1984), pp.283-285.

 

[22] The “latter days” and “time of the end” refers to the time period from the accomplishment of salvation (Dan.9:24) to the Final Judgment (Daniel 12:2-13; compare Daniel 12:4,9 with Revelation 22:10).  Both the Old and New Testament speak about the “end times” being inaugurated with the accomplishment of salvation (cf. Jeremiah 31:31-34,38-40; 33:14-22 with 1 Cor.11:23-25; John 5:45-47 with Deut.31:24-29; see also Acts 2:17; 1 Cor.10:11; Heb.1:2; 9:26; 1 Pet.1:20). 

 

[23] Wilson, 10.

 

[24] Other ancients who read silently include Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar and Augustine (Aune I:20).

 

[25] One practical observation for preachers is that we don’t “sound like books” in the pulpit.  There is a danger in reading theology and commentaries silently all week while preparing a written sermon to be proclaimed orally.

 

[26] See Aune I:21 and Roger Pugsley, “The Sound Aspects of the Greek New Testament”; Westminster Theological Journal Volume 38:192-194.  In this article Pugsley points out, “The earliest readers understood the written surface (whether stone or parchment) as most comprehend a page of music. They recognize the notes as conveying indications of time and pitch. They may be familiar with the whole scheme of musical notation and perhaps have some ability to execute with the voice or an instrument. But nevertheless the mere sight of a page of music will convey nothing to them until a skilled artist translates the characters into sound, so to convey the composer’s intention. It is like most people are toward an orchestral score that the ancient Greeks were toward the written word. It conveyed meaning only as it was sounded and heard” (193).

 

[27] H. I. Marrou, A History of Education in Antiquity (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1956), p. 151; quoted in Stock, 24.

 

[28] “The goal of education in an oral world is the need to remember.  Memory is everything in an orally grounded culture, even as literature is being fashioned in their midst.  And memory is cultivated through repetition” (Victor Wilson, 16).

 

[29] While it goes beyond the purpose of this paper to discuss the dating of Revelation we need to keep in mind that “The conviction that God’s Word speaks directly to every age has not been accompanied by the appreciation that it does so as mediated through its initial historical expression. The contemporary significance of any NT writing does not derive from the fact that it was written expressly for our age but from the conviction that a truth spoken to the first age of Christians can and does remain a truth for every age of believers. Failure to appreciate the historical fashioning and function of Revelation has bred great mischief” (Johnson and Penner, 574).

 

[30] Bauckham argues that Revelation is the fulfillment of the first three petitions of the Lord’s Prayer (Theology, 40). Perhaps it might be better argued that Revelation is the fulfillment of all seven Lord’s Prayer petitions.

 

[31] Janus was the Roman god of doorways.  He had one head and two faces that looked in opposite directions.  January is named after this god because it looks back to the previous year and ahead to the New Year.  When used of literature, a Janus looks back to the previous unit and unites it to the next one.

 

[32]  “A ‘bridge’ passage’ is one which ‘bridges’ or connects two successive units by concluding the first and by introducing the second.  Thus a ‘bridge-passage’ is more than a mere transition, since it serves simultaneously as a conclusion to the first unit and as an introduction to the second.  In other words, it belongs to both the units, just as a bridge over a river belongs to both the banks of the river.  This was a literary device used by ancient authors like Lucian to join the different parts of a well-planned book” (Mlakuzhyil, 104).

 

[33] Adapted from Nils Lund, 353 and Paul Minear who Beale (NIGTC ) quotes on p.135f. The formula, “He who overcomes”, “of the promises to the conquerors, used in each of the seven messages, reappears just once, in the vision of the new Jerusalem (21:7)” (Bauckham, The Book of Revelation, 14).

 

[34] Meredith Kline, “Structure of Revelation” p.19 quoted in Greg Beale, The Book of Revelation NIGTC, 134

 

[35] This diagram was adapted from Edward Robson, “The Apocalypse of Jesus Christ” in Studies in Revelation, [Pittsburgh: Crown & Covenant 1979] pp.13,17.

 

[36] E. Clark Copeland said, “I believe the Scriptures literarily as God literally intended.”  The Dispensational hermeneutic makes the extra-Biblical requirement that the Scriptures be interpreted "literally" wherever possible and figurative only when necessary. But it is no easy thing to find interpreters who will agree on where it is “possible” to interpret the Scripture literally (e.g. the debate about the presence of Jesus in the Lord’s Supper or the Anabaptists from St. Gall who literally believed that we must become as little children to inherit the Kingdom of God and so some of them literally behaved like little children playing with toys and burbling like babies). The literalist hermeneutic – in addition to being found nowhere in Scripture – has had the practical effect of subjecting Scriptural interpretations to the subjective whim of the interpreter (The Report of the Committee to Study the Framework Hypothesis; Presented to the Presbytery of Southern California (OPC) at its Meeting on October 15-16, 1999; http://www.asa3.org/gray/framework/frameworkOPC-SC.html; accessed 10/17/2001).

 

[37]  “If the suffering saints endure their brief trials of “ten days” (2:10), they will receive the reward of the millennial reign.  The intensifying of ten to a thousand together with the lengthening of days to years might suggest that present momentary affliction results in greater glory even in the intermediate state prior to eternal glory” (Beale, The Book of Revelation, 995). 

 

[38] B.B. Warfield eloquently wrote, “The vision [of Revelation 20:1-10], in one word, is a vision of peace of those who have died in the Lord; and its message to us is embodied in the words of xiv.13: “Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord, from henceforth” – of which passage the present is indeed only an expansion.

“The picture that is brought before us here is, in fine, the picture of the “intermediate state” – of the saints of God gathered in heaven away from the confused noise and garments bathed in blood that characterize the war upon earth, in order that they may securely await the end.  The thousand years, thus, is the whole of this present dispensation, which again is placed before us in its entirety but looked at now relatively not to what is passing on earth but to what is enjoyed “in Paradise.”  This, in fact, is the meaning of the symbol of a thousand years.  For, this period between the advents is, on earth, a broken time – three and a half years, a “little time” (ver.3) – which, amid turmoil and trouble, the saints are encouraged to look upon as of short duration, soon to be over…. Of course the passage (xx.1-10) does not give us a direct description of “the intermediate state.”  We must bear in mind that the book we are reading is written in symbols and gives us a direct description of nothing that it sets before us, but always a direct description only of the symbol by which it is represented” (“The Millennium and the Apocalypse,” Princeton Theological Review [1904], 604f.).

 

[39] He [the exegete] might also well observe the likeness between Moses’ record of the creation “week” and certain visions of John, the seer of the Apocalypse, which are heptad in structure with successively numbered divisions and yet are not strictly chronological in sequence. It appears that the God of revelation chose to reveal the primeval ages of creation and the eschatological ages of re-creation in similar literary form (Meredith G. Kline: "Because It Had Not Rained", Westminster Theological Journal, Vol. XX, No. 2 [May 1958], p.157).

 

 

previous page

 

 

Contact Us

 

 

 

 

 

Permissions: You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that you do not alter the wording in any way, you do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction, and you do not make more than 50 physical copies. For web posting, a link to this document on the Christ Church website is preferred. Any exceptions to the above must be explicitly approved by Aaron Goerner.

 

Copyright © 2004-2008 by Aaron Goerner. All Rights Reserved.